From the Mailbag...
Please Tell Me I'm Not Crazy!!!
Dateline: 11/24/97Dear Guide:
I am thoroughly confused. I thought, for sure, that there was a well
documented urban legend about the Nestle corporation. I remember it in
Junior High. We were all told to boycott Nestle because they had
conspired to provide powdered infant formula to third world mothers.
However, the formula was substandard, and by the time that mothers would
figure this out, their own breastmilk would be depleted.
Please tell me I'm not crazy!!!
Dear Reader:
You're not crazy (based on the evidence at hand, that is).
If what you remember hearing is that Nestle was boycotted because its product is "substandard," I'd say the rumor qualifies as an urban legend.
Nestle has indeed been the target of major boycotting efforts over the years, and it still is, but over its marketing practices in developing countries, not the quality of its products.
Here's a list of charges made against the company, courtesy of a group called Baby Food Action:
Nestle denies any wrongdoing. Its defense against the above charges can be found on the company's official Website. [Update: the Nestle page was removed some time after this article was published.]
For more information, see the longish anti-Nestle article published by the Multinational Monitor.
Dear Guide:
Hi, my name is Hannah and I was just wondering where you get your
information about chain letters. I was looking through the Net to see if I
could find something confirming my suspicions about the David Lawitts
letter and your page has it. I want to recommend this site to all the
people who sent me the chain letter so they'll know it's fake but I just
wanted to know if your info is your own opinions or if you have facts to
back you up.
Dear Reader:
Well, it's a combination of facts and common sense. To see how I came to my conclusions about the Lawitts letter, check out my recent feature, Anatomy of a Hoax.
There's no mystery to tearing these things apart. Anybody can do it. Just follow these three rules:
1) Always read the text more than once. These letters are devised to play on our emotions. On a second or third reading, you begin to see through it.
2) Read the text closely, noting all inconsistencies and statements that don't make sense.
3) Do research on factual statements made in the text to see if they can be substantiated.
Remember that the burden of credibility rests with the letter, not you. You needn't prove every single sentence of it false in order to dismiss the whole thing. All you really have to find is one "fatal error."
For example, if the letter claims to have something to do with, say, donations to cancer research, and if it names a particular charitable organization in that connection, its credibility drops to zero if you discover that the organization doesn't exist, or that it doesn't authorize chain letters. Anything else you manage to disprove is gravy.
Dear Guide:
Hello. I, too, have heard about the Disney
legends. Have you heard the one in Aladdin? When he is on the balcony
talking to the Princess, he says "take off your clothes" you can hear it
when the genie is a bee, I think. It's somewhere in that scene. Email me.
I would like to know if I am the only one who knows about this. Thanks for
your time.
Dear Reader:
Yes, I've heard the Aladdin legend. It's false. If you listen closely, what the character actually says is: "Take off and go."
You can read all about it (plus hear sound clips of what Aladdin really says) at the Urban Legends Reference Pages. You'll find other great Disney legends there, as well.
Dear Guide:
Re: misinformation highway. the transference of information via the
internet is indeed still a hands-on practice -- to claim that it is just simple
transfering of information "untouched by human hands" is ridiculous and
paranoid. the source is still human, it is still generated by the human
mind, soul, heart... as such, the internet is just another method of, yes,
transmitting information -- not unlike speech over a telephone, or over any
space no matter how intimate or, inversely, isolated. it (the net) contains
the promise of forming a new language of images and voice -- of shared
experience. why not try to guide it to the best of possibilities rather than
stand by and watch it fall apart?
Dear Reader:
I'll admit to having been a bit sardonic in the concluding few sentences of that article, but you've misread me if you think I want to "stand by and watch [the possibilities of the Internet] fall apart." Quite the opposite.
For one thing, here I am, actively participating in the medium. By choice! For another, I made a rather strong moral statement in that article: that individuals ought to take responsibility and be held accountable for the information that passes through their computer. I meant it.
The closing sentences were not a declaration of apathy, although I see how they might be misread that way. I was just trying to acknowledge, after having taken my stand, that the vagaries of human nature most often undercut any simple moral solutions to our problems. And in that regard, there truly is nothing new under the sun.
Dear Guide:
This is a LEGAL, MONEY-MAKING PHENOMENON.
PRINT this letter, read the directions, THEN READ IT AGAIN !!!
You are about to embark on the most profitable and unique program you may ever see. Many times over, it has demonstrated and proven its ability to generate large amounts of cash. This program is showing fantastic appeal with a huge and ever-growing on-line population desirous of additional income.
This is a legitimate, LEGAL, money-making opportunity. It does not require you to come in contact with people, do any hard work, and best of all, you never have to leave the house, except to get the mail and go to the bank!
Dear Reader:
Somebody's playing a very sick joke on me, right?

